LOL i liked the original Linkin Park song Numb
linkin park + trance vibes = bucket. new mathematical equations...
-
Welcome to AH.FM
Join the Biggest EDM Community, engage in discussions, share music, and connect with fellow electronic music enthusiasts!
-
Stream Live Player Pop Up | Winamp | Premium
30-11-2008 Ladies Night 001
- Thread starter dan
- Start date
linkin park + trance vibes = bucket. new mathematical equations...
2 comments-
i am guessing there is some connection between the amount of sugar, cocoa, and cooking method of the peanuts that make them so irresistable...:crazy:
Wouldn't it have been better to keep the T-site up until the new o-d was available?
not really, if you read the thread you will find the reasons, it had to be done right away
agree:grinning: If I give a trance party someday - and there are people who want to hear LinkinPark..
now a famous
Last edited:
I didn't say it was awesome or anything, I said it wasn't too bad... lolmehhh mixing rock in trance, not thanks
Linkin park isn't exactly rock anyway... it's more like emo techo with some hip hop and rap thrown in... it's like some emo kid was rolling on E and puked into a blender...
a'ndY..ur avatar...still..:LMAO:
thanks, but yours is the best... Elisha... :wub: :wub: :wub:
care to say that in English too?
lol ^^ I've made some screenshots, maybe they help^^
That's the original recording of one of my sets:
Loads of dynamics, some nasty peaks though, so I used a limiter to get rid of them - here's the result:
Dynamics are still there, but the overall volume's a bit higher, and the peaks are gone.
Now this is how a set looks like, where the dynamics are smashed:
Of course this is much louder, but it has killed what makes lots of trance tracks beautiful, the dynamics.
Hope this helps a bit ^^
lol ^^ I've made some screenshots, maybe they help^^
That's the original recording of one of my sets:
....
and this is what an uncompressed, unlimited and unnormalized set like from ms sky looks like
case closed
Well, she certainly preserved all the dynamics
well but you must admit the sound was really low, compairing with the prevous set and the follow one, but i'm suspect because i'm a purist and i like to hear a good quality and banging sounds
well but you must admit the sound was really low, compairing with the prevous set and the follow one, but i'm suspect because i'm a purist and i like to hear a good quality and banging sounds
Yeah, I was a bit ironic
Of course it was way too low, but I prefer a set where the volume's too low than a set with smashed dynamics. I have a volume control, so I can simply turn my stereo up
But enough of the techtalk, even though I love talking about audio stuff, I've learned that most people don't care about it, and it's also off topic (but we can continue our discussion in another topic or by PM if you want to :smile1
that is of course true, but on a radio it's pretty annoying when you have to turn the volume up for one set, and then the next one suddenly blows you away cause its +5 db. so normalizing should be the bare minimum, and compressing too much should be a no-noOf course it was way too low, but I prefer a set where the volume's too low than a set with smashed dynamics. I have a volume control, so I can simply turn my stereo up
(and since you like tech talk: recording the set at too low volume will make you lose dynamics as well, due to the limited 16-bit precision of most audio stuff... unless the original recording was done at larger sample sizes than your audio output uses AND you're using an mp3-level pre-amplifier when playing the audio back...
)