Altered-Mind
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 42,942
- Reaction score
- 14
for me is clear,is hard to explainenlighten me cause i don't get it why its a FAIL LMAO
:LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO:
:LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO:
for me is clear,is hard to explain
is not the pic,is the comment on the piccause there's nothing wrong in that pic
FAIL!!!
/bad_rolex.jpg[/IMG]
nope...ancient romans used IIII instead of IV, and its actually quite common in roman numeral watches to have IIII...:tongue:
i wonder what is in there :LMAO::LMAO::LMAO:So much for the pot o'gold?!?